Skip to content

Conversation

jblomer
Copy link
Contributor

@jblomer jblomer commented Aug 1, 2025

No changes to the on-disk format.

@jblomer jblomer self-assigned this Aug 1, 2025
@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch 2 times, most recently from 74816d1 to b5897c4 Compare August 1, 2025 13:24
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Test Results

    21 files      21 suites   3d 9h 33m 4s ⏱️
 3 558 tests  3 421 ✅  0 💤 137 ❌
72 971 runs  72 817 ✅ 17 💤 137 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 0b31cde.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch from b5897c4 to 133130d Compare August 2, 2025 21:22
@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch from 133130d to 174de14 Compare August 22, 2025 14:01
@jblomer jblomer changed the title [ntuple] rename 'leaf' structural role to 'static' [ntuple] rename 'leaf' structural role to 'plain' Aug 22, 2025
@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch from 174de14 to 37bd740 Compare August 22, 2025 14:22
Copy link
Member

@pcanal pcanal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@vepadulano vepadulano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch from 37bd740 to d541b57 Compare August 25, 2025 15:14
The name 'plain field' should better describe the actual structural
role (resp. the absence of a structural role) of these fields.

No change to the on-disk data.
@jblomer jblomer force-pushed the ntuple-rename-leaf branch from d541b57 to 0b31cde Compare August 25, 2025 16:04
The structural role "leaf" was ill-named because in the tree of fields
also inner nodes can carry that role. Hence renamed to "plain". Plain
nodes are either leaves or they are inner "wrapper fields" with exactly
one child field of the same cardinality (same number of elements modulo
field repetition).
@jblomer jblomer merged commit c935ac6 into root-project:master Aug 26, 2025
23 of 26 checks passed
@jblomer jblomer deleted the ntuple-rename-leaf branch August 26, 2025 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants